The L3C: A New Tool for Social Enterprise

By Heather Peeler

Senior Consultant, Community Wealth Ventures

 

As the social enterprise field evolves and grows, there is a great deal of debate on legal and structural issues. Given the social and financial objectives of social enterprise, many argue that existing corporate structures are inadequate. On the one hand, tax-exempt organizations have limited avenues to access capital, and a strong profit orientation may jeopardize their tax status. On the other hand, corporate structures do not satisfactorily recognize the public benefits that are the core of social enterprise.

In an effort to find a practical solution, Robert Lang, CEO of the Mary Elizabeth and Gordon B. Mannweiler Foundation, is leading the charge to establish the Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C).

What is the L3C?
Lang's proposed L3C, a form of Limited Liability Company (LLC), would be a for-profit entity organized to engage in socially beneficial activities. The traditional LLC provides a flexible ownership structure whereby different owners of a single company can receive different economic benefits. Lang’s proposed L3C takes the concept one step further. The L3C’s unique structure would allow foundations to invest by using an alternative to grants—program-related investments (PRIs). It can have different classes of investors—such as individuals, government agencies, nonprofits, and for-profits—with foundations taking the most risk. The L3C’s investment structure would be designed to bring new pools of funds such as pension and endowment investments to bear on problems normally treatable only by nonprofit dollars.

By being a defined entity organized under state laws, the L3C would usually eliminate legal fees and organizational costs associated with PRIs. It would allow the use of the more efficient free enterprise system unburdened by nonprofit regulation. Finally, its financial structure would allow the creation of a saleable product by the financial industry.

How would foundations benefit?
Foundations are required to pay out annually at least 5 percent of their assets as grants to nonprofits. However, through PRIs, they could make investments in for-profit or nonprofit ventures. A PRI can be a loan, loan guarantee, equity purchase, or other investment that will further the foundation’s philanthropic purposes. However, PRIs are legally complex and expensive for foundations to administer. Only 5 percent of all foundations have used PRIs. The L3C would have much lower transactional costs and allow the foundation to satisfy its philanthropic mandate and possibly generate a modest return, while drawing additional investors to the entity.

Already in the works
Lang is already trying to establish the first L3C in North Carolina, where the furniture manufacturing industry has been hard hit by increased global competition. Lang is working to establish L3Cs that would be owned by his and other foundations, individuals, and institutional investors. The L3Cs will buy factories in the state, make them green and up-to-date, and lease them to furniture manufacturers at a low rate, thereby helping the manufacturers to be more competitive and preserve jobs. The foundations would take the top tier of ownership in the L3C and assume the greatest financial risk. The next tier might be taken by banks, wealthy community-minded individuals, or institutions, and the bottom tier would be a AAA investment that could be sold to pension or endowment funds. Lang is in discussions with many large financial institutions to enable the L3C to become a viable investment product.

This structure could have broad applications in the housing and economic development fields. “What we’re doing is opening up PRIs and the whole socially beneficial sector,” explains Lang. “[The L3C] will become a vehicle for bringing in more money to socially beneficial entities without compromising the return.”

What are the next steps?
Lang’s efforts represent the collaboration of a multitude of individuals and organizations, including Ashoka, the Council on Foundations, the Kauffman Foundation, and Caplin & Drysdale, among others. Currently, the North Carolina state legislature is considering legislation introduced by State Senator Jim Jacumin to legalize the L3C as a form of LLC. Feasibility studies are in the works in several other states.

Marcus Owens at Caplin & Drysdale has written a model L3C operating agreement, and Lang has plans to publish a manual so that others can follow in their footsteps.

“Once it gets off the ground, people will find creative uses,” says Lang. “The L3C will allow you to reinvest in your own state, in your community, and at a good return. It has the potential to become a market-rate solution.”

More information on the L3C is available from Americans for Community Development.

 

» BACK TO FRONT PAGE

» Message from the President

» Economics: The Mother of Innovation

» Identifying the Cost of Doing Good

» Social Enterprises: What Keeps You Up at Night?

» Top Ten: Best Ways to Foster Innovation

» Meeting Summary: Creating Social Capital Markets

» New and Noteworthy

» FRONT PAGE

 

“[The]proposed L3C, a form of Limited Liability Company, would be a for-profit entity organized to engage in socially beneficial activities.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“[The L3C] will become a vehicle for bringing in more money to socially beneficial entities without compromising the return.”